Testimonials Team FAQs Blog Weekly Newsletter Contact Us
Back to Blog

August 14, 2026 · By Levi Sereg

Case Study: Electrician Trade School — $756 Cost Per Enrollment at 30x ROAS

Share:

Most agencies would show you cost per lead and call it a win. Cost per lead is a vanity metric — the number an agency shows you when it doesn’t know what happened downstream. The number that actually matters is what a school spent to get one enrolled student.

For an electrician school on the East Coast, that number is $756 — against $23,000 in tuition per student. Here’s the full system behind it.


The setup

The school was already generating leads: Google Ads, word of mouth, referrals, a little social. The challenge was never volume. The problems were structural — cost per lead was inconsistent and untracked, the enrollment pipeline lived in an Excel sheet, and there was no clear line from ad spend to enrollment to tuition revenue. The school couldn’t answer the only question that matters: if we put a dollar in, what comes out?

The goal wasn’t more leads. It was predictability — put an investment in, know what comes out, and turn the lever up or down depending on how many seats need filling.


The machine we built

Seven pieces work together, each solving a different part of the funnel:

1. Understand the student

Not demographics — the situation. Two completely different people convert on this program, and they don’t respond to the same ad. The young adult (17-28) is in a warehouse, at Amazon or UPS, or in fast food, making $15-22/hour. College either didn’t appeal or didn’t work out. His fear isn’t failure — it’s drifting through his twenties with nothing to show for it. The career changer (30-45) is a burned-out restaurant manager, a CDL driver who wants to be home at night, an office employee capped at $45-55K, a veteran, or a construction laborer wanting a specialized skill. Her fear is specific: being 45 and still financially stuck. One is running from feeling behind. The other is running from a ceiling. Write one ad for both, and it speaks to neither.

2. Pull out the strongest value proposition

The core angle: 80% hands-on, 20% lecture. Most trade programs lean heavy on textbooks; here, students are on real wiring boards early, running residential and commercial install simulations. For a student who didn’t do well in a traditional classroom, that’s not a feature — it’s permission to believe they can succeed. The rest of the stack backs it up: OSHA 30 certification included, a short program timeline, employer-aligned skills, instructor oversight, and real accountability. And instead of “great earning potential,” the ads give three specific rungs on a ladder: $17-23/hour entry, $30-45/hour at two to five years, $80,000-$150,000+ long term. Specificity converts skeptics. Vague optimism converts nobody.

3. Build direct-response video ads with one job: stop the scroll

Separate hooks run for each avatar. The ad doesn’t sell the program — it buys attention. Because the program is inherently visual (wiring boards, panels, real hands-on work), the lab footage does more than any headline could. Social gives an advantage search can’t: the ability to force nurture content in front of someone before they ever type in a search query.

4. Send them to a mini-webinar before the ad ever tries to close

A short landing page with a deeper video covers the schedule (including after-hours options), financing, what the lab looks like, and what happens after graduation. Most importantly, it answers the exact objections students voice in every enrollment conversation — what if I fail, what if I can’t find a job, what if I waste my money, what if I’m not smart enough — before an admissions rep ever burns a 15-minute call handling something the video should have already killed.

5. Keep the intro call short

Four jobs only: understand their background, connect the program to earning potential, walk through financing, and move them to the next real step. Not a 30-minute interrogation.

6. Get them in the building

For a hands-on program, the campus tour is the real conversion event — not the application. Once a prospect is standing in the lab looking at the wiring boards, the sale is mostly made. Everything upstream exists to get the right person into that room.

7. Keep selling after the call is booked

Booking doesn’t mean convinced, and it doesn’t mean they’ll show. A confirmation page keeps building conviction, prospects get the option to call in immediately instead of waiting, and a multi-touch email and SMS sequence holds attention until the call happens and after. Every point in the funnel builds trust. Don’t waste a pixel of it.


The results

Metric Result
Meta ad spend$4,537 (~80 days, ~$50/day)
Enrollments6 (confirmed and trackable)
New tuition revenue$138,000
Return on ad spend~30x
Cost per enrolled student$756
Tuition per student$23,000
Ad cost as % of tuition revenue~3.3%

The metric almost nobody tracks

Financing approval rate. A student can see the ad, book the call, tour the campus, love the program, decide to enroll — and only then discover they can’t get approved for financing. That’s not a marketing problem and it’s not a closing problem. It’s a sequencing problem: the ad dollars, the admissions time, and the open house seat are already spent, and the deal dies at the last step over something that could have been known at the first. Moving the financing conversation earlier and tracking approval like the conversion step it is can move more enrollments than doubling the ad budget.


The takeaway

Cost per lead tells you almost nothing about the economics of an enrollment operation. A school can have cheap leads and terrible enrollment economics, or expensive leads and excellent enrollment economics. The number that matters is what happens downstream. Schools don’t need more leads. They need more enrollments.

If you don’t know your true cost per enrollment — not cost per lead — talk to Atomic Enrollment about building a system that tracks it.

Recent Posts

Ready to grow your enrollments?

Set Up an Intro Meeting